Causal Pluralism and Force Dynamics
نویسنده
چکیده
Causal relations permeate human knowledge across a wide range of domains, from the physical to the abstract. The existence of causal relations in many different domains raises an interesting challenge for accounts of causation. On the one hand, the word cause, and related words, can be used to describe a very wide range of situations, consistent with the possibility that people’s representation of causation is based on a single notion of causation, a perspective often called causal monism. On the other hand, as discussed in this chapter, it has proven difficult to develop a unitary theory of causation capable of addressing the various phenomena associated with causation. The difficulty in developing such a theory points to the possibility that people represent causation in several different ways, a view commonly referred to as causal pluralism (Cartwright 2004, DeVreese 2006, Godfrey-Smith 2010, Longworth 2010, Psillos 2008, Reiss 2009, Lombrozo 2010, Hall 2004, Hitchcock 2003, Lakoff & Johnson 1999).
منابع مشابه
Force interaction in the expression of causation
Causal meanings in verbs such as cause, enable and prevent have been analyzed as having two components that correspond to two interacting forces or tendencies: one associated with the agent and one with the patient (Talmy 2000; Wolff 2007). In this research we extend a force-dynamic analysis to a wider range of causal and quasi-causal expressions such as lead to, because, and after. The “struct...
متن کاملDisentangling Causal Pluralism∗
Causal pluralism is increasingly gaining interest as a promising alternative for monistic approaches toward causation. However, although the debate is scarcely out of the egg, the term “causal pluralism” already covers diverse meanings. This creates confusion, and to remedy that confusion, it is necessary to discern different kinds of pluralistic approaches to causation and different possible p...
متن کاملNatural Selection and Causal Productivity
In the recent philosophical literature, two questions have arisen concerning the status of natural selection: 1) Is it a population-level phenomenon, or is it an organism-level phenomenon? 2) Is it a causal process, or is it a purely statistical summary of lower-level processes? In an earlier work (Millstein 2006), I argue that natural selection should be understood as a population-level causal...
متن کاملThe Need for Pluralism of Causality
It will be shown in this article that a pluralism of causality is needed. Not only, as might be expected, for such different domains as natural sciences and humanities, but even within the domain of physics different causal relations are necessary. This will be illustrated with examples from Classical Mechanics and Special Relativity, Thermodynamics and Quantum Mechanics. In these domains causa...
متن کاملPhysicalism, Pluralism and Causal Completeness: On the Metaphysical Foundations for Philosophy of Mind
The so-called Exclusion argument (Kim 2000; Papineau 2004) about mental causation applies one premise that is typically accepted without much discussion: the thesis of causal completeness of the physical domain (CCP). In part one I evaluate Papineau’s (2001) argument for the CCP. I argue that this argument is not satisfying and that it is incomplete. The rest of the thesis is dedicated to an al...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013